Parenting resources with sources · Ages 0–18
ResearchMeta-analysisEvidence: Large study or reviewAges 0–3

Early parenting support: what a global review found

Parenting interventions to promote early child development in the first three years of life: A global systematic review and meta-analysis

Author or publisher Jeong J, Franchett EE, Ramos de Oliveira CV, Rehmani K, Yousafzai AK Published 2021 Reviewed by eduStack editors Last checked 14 Nov 2026

Evidence: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials; the pooled results do not validate eduStack as an intervention.

1What the study found

Across 102 randomised trials in 33 countries, parenting programmes in the first three years improved several child-development and caregiving outcomes. Results varied, and parental depressive symptoms did not improve significantly overall.

2What question it helps with

What evidence supports organised early-parenting support, and what should not be promised?

3Who it is for

Caregivers and readers interested in programmes delivered during the first three years. The review covers varied interventions, settings and participants.

4How it relates to this stage

The evidence concerns interventions in the first three years, not the whole 0–18 age range.

5Reading notes

Our summary and paraphrase. Read alongside the source.
  • Cognitive, language, motor, social-emotional and some parenting outcomes improved on average.
  • Effects differed by outcome and programme; caregiver depression did not improve significantly overall.
  • Long-term follow-up and implementation in different local settings remain important.

6How to use this resource

  • Use this review to understand the rationale for responsive-care resources.
  • When considering a programme, check its age range, content, support and evaluation rather than borrowing the review’s average effect.

7Limits and things to keep in mind

A review of structured interventions does not prove that a website, short article or isolated activity produces the same benefit. Programme variation, study reporting and limited long-term data restrict generalisation.

8Sources and check record

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003602 Jeong J, Franchett EE, Ramos de Oliveira CV, Rehmani K, Yousafzai AK. Parenting interventions to promote early child development in the first three years of life: A global systematic review and meta-analysis. 2021. PLOS Medicine, 18(5), e1003602. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1003602 Open full text (PLOS Medicine / PMC) ↗ Last checked · 14 Nov 2026

Verified the DOI, abstract and open full-text discussion, limitations and conclusions. Did not independently reanalyse the trials or all supplementary data.

Access and use: Open-access article. This page is our summary, not a reproduction of intervention curricula.

Where this study is used